Part I - Continued
Joseph Bucklin Society.  A National History Center for the Gaspee Affair of 1772 and the Bucklin Family 1600-1899.


Home Page

In This Section

Page Up

Books you can buy
from Our JBS Bookstore

Bucklin logo mugs, caps
 T-shirts, clothing,
 and gift items.

Receive free newsletter about History & Bucklins.

(If you did not receive our last December newsletter, it means the email address you gave us is no longer valid. If you want to again be on the list to receive our newsletter, you must opt-in again by using the above link to "Receive newsletter")

The Six Hundred Acres


By 1645, in Hingham and nearby Weymouth, Massachusetts, town governments made it clear that if a settler wasn't not in concord with majority views on religion and property, he'd be moving out of the town. (1) By 1636, the Baptist Roger Williams had fled the Massachusetts Bay Colony and settled in the Rehoboth, Rhode Island area, on the east side of the Seekonk, or Pawtucket River. His short-lived 1635 settlement at that east side location ended when the Plymouth Colony forced him from this land. But when the Plymouth colony claimed this land, he moved to the west bank of the river and called his new settlement "Providence". (2)

Weymouth, of the Plymouth Colony, also became a place of religious controversy, carried on by the Reverend Samuel Newman and his band of dissenters. Newman was at some odds with the official religious doctrine of the Colony. The growing population of Plymouth made it necessary to approve new settlements, , and probably the Plymouth Colony thought it prudent to sell land, when requested by  Newman and his group, as if the Newman church group  were a church group with a full Established Church doctrine. Newman and a part of his congregation left the Bay Colony and headed into the Pawtucket area,. (3)   Newman named the new settlement Rehoboth.

In the area of Rehoboth: the first European settler and land owner on the east side of the Pawtucket River probably was John Hazel. In 1641, before Newsman's purchase, Hazell had purchased land from Natives in the Rehoboth area; in 1642, Hazell resided there with 600 acres he owned on the Pawtucket River, including the strategic falls. Hazel may have purchased his land directly from Osamequin, the Wampanoag sachem, and he lived at peace with the Indians.

Indeed, Hazel probably was on the land before the Roger William's first Seekonk settlement, on the east side of the Pawtucket River. But the Massachusetts Bay colony insisted that they had jurisdiction over the land and Hazels divested himself of the land at the insistence of the colony--not by yielding it to them, but by selling to Edward Smith.

Smith, who in turn had the same sort of troubles about the right to be on the land. The Bay Colony simply did not recognize the purchase from the Indians, claiming that the land was theirs in their grant from the King of England. Smith was faced with continuing problems unless he could sell to someone willing to run the risk of being disposed by the Bay Colony. And that person was William Bucklin.

Apparently William decided about this time to move west to the Narragansett Bay river area (on the edge of what later would be Rehoboth) a short distance east from Hingham.. Certainly, the Rehoboth Town Meeting Records of February 1, 1645, tell us, ". . . At the same time the way to William Buckland's house is agreed on by those partyes which it doth conform." So we know that probably at least by the fall of 1644, Bucklin had built a house on the land. William's house stood in the area of the 1641 property deal made with Natives by John Hazels.

The date of 1656 is usually given as the date when William moved his family to Rehoboth from Hingham, but probably only because the Old Proprietary Records of Rehoboth show on a 1656 date the land of William Bucklin recorded by his description as being,

"600 acres of land wch John Hazels wch I bought of Edward Smith bounded on Pawtucket River on the west & unto a Run Yours truly, comes from the cedar swamp on the east upon the south with lands yours truly was John Reads and upon the north the common as we go to Mr. Blaxtons." (4)

Unless William obtained this Hazel-Smith land by some kind of credit or trade, he was a wealthy man. Six hundred acres is about a square mile, almost equal to all the land holdings of Rev. Newman and his entire congregation in their Rehoboth settlement. Moreover, William obtained other lands, presumably for cash. Maybe he was a man of some substance when he came, although apparently working as a carpenter. In 17th-century America , working as a carpenter sometimes indicated a lack of sufficient funds to purchase land. However William was clearly not impoverished. (5)

William may moved to Rehoboth around 1643, settled on at least part of Hazell's land, then in 1645, when the Newman congregation came with their purchase, he made a record, with the way to his house agreed upon and noted in the town records. At any time before the Newman purchase of 1645, William could have bought the entire six hundred acres from Hazels and Smith--perhaps an easy transactions after their difficulties with the colony--and in 1656 recording his entire purchase in the town records as he did, since by then he would have felt safer to do so without problems from the Massachusetts colonies.

William needed to make his six hundred acres a matter of record in 1656 because the town of Rehoboth was planning more purchases in the Bucklin part of the forest. According to town records for February 12, 1657, at the town meeting for Rehoboth, certain men were sent to go see what meadows they could find north of the town for purchase by the town. This land subsequently became known as the North Purchase and was immediately to the north of the Bucklin land on the river. (6)

May 25, 1661, William sold land in Hingham on May 25, 1661. (7) We might conjecture that by then he had no need to create a "cover story" of temporary sojourn in Rehoboth, or we could speculate that he rented the land and his former house for years and finally sold it to liquidate the assets.

At Rehoboth, William participated in lot divisions of 1668 for meadows north of the town which were referred to as the "North Purchase." (8) William and the town disputed the exact border between the north side of his property in Rehoboth, and the south border of the North Purchase. On April 18, 1666, town officials decided by vote that a three-rail fence be set up between the town's purchased lands on the plain "from Goodman Buckland's house to the Mill River," to separate William's land from the North Purchase land.

Although it might appear that the town was trying to protect William's land, the decision to fence came shortly after the town found it needed wanted a public way down away from the river to the "salt marsh" area of the estuary, where the cows could get necessary salt for their diet. William owned the entire shoreline from the falls, which were the north end of the tidal river southward for about two miles; above the falls the river contained no sea water, and the town wanted a right-of-way.

Committees are a particularly American form of power structure, and sometime in 1666, townsmen formed one to purchase a right-of-way through the Bucklin land and also to investigate exactly where the Bucklin land lay, which they apparently did to William's satisfaction during the sale negotiations. By then, town officials called William "Goodman Bucklin" instead of "William Bucklin," indicating he was regarded as part of the gentry of the town.

William's land ran along the river and had reached far back in depth, (9) clear to "'Bucklin's Brook," a live stream that furnished running water close to their home. On the river side, the property included the falls, a primary fishing spot for both the Indians and early settlers, especially when salmon headed upstream each year,. And anyone who was willing to slog and swim through the shallow river pools above the falls would find this the first place to cross Naragannset Bay on foot.

With all varieties of land, salt marsh, meadows, and forest, level and high enough to be above spring floods, the spot was important. In 1656, the falls area was the best place to put a bridge over to Providence, and was the spot where people had to get out of their canoes or boats and maneuver around the falls to continue upstream. And William's spot on the river offered the best place to put a mill (and was the place of the first mill in the area). (10)

In 1656 William served on a grand jury in Rehoboth. Again, this suggests that William was well established by this time, because the grand jury had to be composed of men well acquainted with the persons and affairs of the area. The Plymouth Colony Record for February 12, 1657, shows William took the oath of Fidelity and therefore was listed in the colony's records as a "freeman," or one who had made the formal pledge of allegiance to the colonial government. On that same day at the Rehoboth town meeting, several men agreed to go see what meadows they could find north of the town for purchase by the town. William apparently intended to be in the group participating in these new lands, which may explain his taking the pledge. In another 1657 event, he was appointed a constable of Rehoboth, again indicating his position as a man of standing and respect in the community .

William's land was outside the "Ring of the Green," as the core of Newman's Rehoboth settlement was called. And his theology was outside Newman's Pawtucket Congregational covenant. William apparently was a Baptist, (11) because later he affiliated with the Baptist Church in Swansea. But though not a member of Newman's Pawtucket congregation, William did carpenter work on the church, and William's son Joseph along with other Bucklins, is buried in the Newman churchyard.

William's brother-in-law Jonathan Bosworth apparently left Hingham around the time William did, and removed to Rehoboth. Religion might explain William's and Jonathan's moves to Rehoboth. The early Bucklins tended to be members of the Baptist churches, and not of the Established churches of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. On Feb 20 1678, William deeded to Jonathan twelve acres of "upland in Wachamoket Neck." That deed recognized the "government of New Plymouth in New England" as in control of the town of Rehoboth. That deed coincides with the time of the ending of the disastrous King Philips's War (12) which destroyed so many lives and buildings. William Bucklin contributed funds for the "defense" of the colony in that war.

The Bucklins had three children: Joseph, born June 26,1633; Benjamin, born July 2,1640; and Lydia Bucklin, probably born about 1622.

William Bucklin died in 1683, a wealthy, important man with lands, children, and grandchildren. The only record of the death is in the Rehoboth Vital Record Death Book, Volume One, page 56, which only says "buried September 1, 1683." There is no note as to the place or date of his death. His burial was reported to be in Rehoboth, with a gravestone, but no cemetery marker is known to exist as of the year 2001. Mary Bosworth died in 1687.

Continue to Part II: Where do Bucklins come from?


ENDNOTES

1. JBS Webmaster note: E.g., Quakers were ordered out of town, subject to a complicated schedule of various parts of their bodies being cut off on their return to town. In a few years the penalties were simplified: a returning Quaker was hanged!

2. The east bank of the river, Seekonk, or Pawtucket, continued to be an area of religious dissenters who were not approved persons by the Bay Colony for settlement in that area (which the Bay Colony claimed as part of their colonial grant from England).

3. They purchased land in 1643 from the Bay Colony in what is now Pawtucket, Massachusetts. They named the area Rehoboth. It was on the east side of the Pawtucket River and about three miles from the falls which was the later heart of Pawtucket (and the Industrial Revolution Moses Brown/ Jenks industrial community.

4. Bucklin here doesn't swear to a date when he bought the land or moved on it. William may well have obtained the land from Hazel-Smith and started living there by 1640 or so, but did not advertise his exact place to the Bay Colony. JBS Webmaster note: This description is the same as in the deed of Hazel's from the Indians.

JBS Webmaster note: Interestingly, Jonathan Bosworth also had land at the exact area in Pawtucket, at the falls, as William had, but Jonathan did not record his land dealings in Pawtucket until the 1660's. Jonathan had sold his house lots and most of his land in Hingham by 1640, and there is no record of a home for him until the 1660's, when he shows up in Rehoboth land records concerning an apparently already existing land involvement. Jonathan sold the rest of his Hingham land in 1661, within a month of when William sold his Hingham land. [See Anderson, Great Migration 1620, at entry for Jonathan Bosworth.]

5. William did not inherit from his father-in-law, Edward Bosworth; and his wife, only 5 schillings from her father, who left only that same small amount to her brother Jonathan, who go t nor more because of his Baptist beliefs..

6. Today this part of Rehoboth is almost the same bounds as the east side of Pawtucket, RI. The former Rehoboth, MA, is now partly in East Providence, RI, and partly in Pawtucket, RI. The sequence is that there first was the area known as Seconet or Seekonk. In 1645 Seconet became the town of Rehoboth. The town of Rehoboth purchased land to the north of the land of William Bucklin, which land was known as the "North Purchase". Attleboro , mentioned in some records in connection with the Bucklin family, became a separate town when it separated from Rehoboth in 1694 as the North Purchase land. Attleboro exchanged land with Rehoboth in 1710. Pawtucket, at first a part of Massachusetts, joined Rhode Island in 1862.

7. JBS Webmaster note: see footnote 11, re brother in law Jonathan.

8. Later, in 1694, the North Purchase area would be established as Attleboro, in Bristol County, Massachusetts, with about 180 inhabitants.

9. JBS Webmaster note: Generally William had about two miles of river frontage and ½ mile in depth back from the shoreline.

10. The area would someday, after the building of Slater's Mill, gain notoriety as the beginning point of the Industrial Revolution.

11. JBS Webmaster footnote: brother in law Jonathan, who seems to have been geographically near the moves of William in the 1635 - 1670 period, also was a Baptist. Jonathan even gave up inheriting from his father for this beliefs, his father stating: "but for ... Jonathan he shall have nothing to do with anything I have except he decline from that opinion of the Anabaptists which he now holds ..."

12. In 1620 when the English first settled in New England, relations between the Indians and the colonists were friendly. Massasoit, sachem of the Wampanoag tribe, brought food to sustain the newcomers through their first winter and helped them adjust to life in this strange, new world. As more and more colonists flooded into New England, strains in the relationship began to appear. The English were convinced that the various tribes should be under colonial control. Unless the Indians were willing to surrender their independence, conflict was inevitable. Finally, in 1675, the battle was joined. Massasoit's son, Metacomet, called Philip by the English, led his tribe into a final struggle.

In 1676, the battle was over. Philip was slain, his body drawn and quartered, and his head paraded in triumph in Plymouth. Philip's son, Massasoit's grandson, was sold into slavery in Bermuda. The generosity of Massasoit toward the Puritans in 1620 indirectly resulted in the enslavement of his grandson 56 years later.

Ingram has provided a Documents Events List of some of the sources drawn on for her story. In addition, generally  references and especially [References in brackets] on any page in this website are to books, or other materials, listed in  the Joseph Bucklin Society Library Catalog.]

                                            GASPEE HISTORY AMERICAN HISTORY BUCKLIN HISTORY THE SOCIETY 

          © 1998 to 24-02-2008 Leonard Bucklin ©     See Copyright Information.  Warnings.  Disclaimers
Privacy Policies of the Society