|
|
|
Books you can buy
Bucklin logo mugs, caps
Receive free newsletter about History & Bucklins. (If you did not receive our last December newsletter, it means the email address you gave us is no longer valid. If you want to again be on the list to receive our newsletter, you must opt-in again by using the above link to "Receive newsletter") |
Rhode Island appointed their own judges and took the legal position that just as in England, the King could not remove judges at pleasure. [Quincy Reports 302-303 (1767)] Massachusetts took a similar position. This allowed the common law court system of Massachusetts Bay and Rhode Island to threaten the British navy and officials into ineffectiveness as long as open war was not declared. Two legal tools were actively used by the colonists, not by the Crown: (1) English law applied by local judges, and (2) lawsuits decided by Rhode Island juries. The law that was practiced was an American version of English common law, locally controlled and administered. The judiciary of Massachusetts Bay and Rhode Island during the pre-revolutionary period were professionally competent and sophisticated. The Attorneys were trained in England and in English common law. and they understood it. They knew the law, and the judges and juries were ready to adopt any legal theory or fact that would protect the Whig (American) position. There is an extensive article on this subject at our discussion
of the events preceding the 1772 attack on the Gaspee. Go there to read the
legal points that lawyers appreciate, and historians have generally overlooked.
These legal tools made it impossible to effectively enforce English
customs and tax law, but left the English with no effective way to counter the
active American resistance.
For a discussion of the names and jurisdiction of the Rhode Island courts, see RI Courts. |
|
© 1998 to
24-02-2008 Leonard
Bucklin © See Copyright
Information. Warnings. Disclaimers |